When safety is more important than security, fail-secure locks are best used. The Lock Surgeon Sutton Coldfield
In locations where valuables are kept, fail-secure locks work best. Fail-secure locks work well in safes and keypad locks. Any place where important documents or money are kept is safe, and people are unlikely to get stuck behind locked doors.
Hans Gruber, the antagonist in the classic action film Die Hard, tries to steal a fortune from Nakatomi Plaza by deceiving the FBI into cutting off the power. Hans is able to steal the fortune by opening a safe because of this. The fact of the matter is that Hans’s plan would have been thwarted from the beginning if the Nakatomi Corporation had only utilized fail-secure locks.
When safety is at stake, you shouldn’t use fail-secure locks. It is dangerous to use fail-secure locks instead of fail-safe locks to enter or exit commercial buildings. People may be trapped inside in the event that something happens to the power.
If the emergency exits have locks that fail to secure, they pose a particular risk. Power outages occur frequently during emergency situations.
Regardless of whether your lock has no individuals behind it, guarantee that it doesn’t safeguard assets that you could require speedy admittance to, similar to medication or food.
Overall, before purchasing fail-secure versus fail-safe locks, determine whether safety is a concern because safety is where these locks fail. Fail-secure locks are not a good idea if a locked door is dangerous.
Fail-Safe versus Fail-Secure Locks
Which is better after all of that? What consensus exists regarding fail-safe versus fail-secure? Neither is superior to the other. Both fail-safe and fail-secure are useful in some situations. There is a reason why businesses offer both: They can be utilized by a wide range of customers.
The distinction between fail-safe and fail-secure can be reduced to two separate inquiries. Is anyone safe from the lock? If not, is the object it is safeguarding essential to life? You ought to purchase a lock that is fail-safe if both of these questions are answered with a “no.” Fail-safe is preferred if any of the answers are “yes.”
The ideal lock would be one that could be unlocked in an emergency but locked when thieves pretend to be in an emergency to break in. Naturally, this is not physically possible at this time. Perhaps in the future, we will develop technology that can anticipate an individual’s intentions before allowing them to open a lock. That does not currently exist.
Therefore, the question is, which intention is more likely? Is this a scenario in which a trapped individual is honestly attempting to leave an area that someone is attempting to enter for illicit purposes?
Use fail-safe locks for doors and fail-secure locks for safes when deciding between fail-secure and fail-safe options. Keep your valuables safe in well-chosen safes, and lock the doors so that no one can get out.